Can You Kill Yourself With Airsoft Gun

Special report past Madeline Drexler, Editor, Harvard Public Wellness

In the national debate over gun violence—a debate stoked by mass murders such every bit last Dec's tragedy in a Newtown, Connecticut, simple school—a glaring fact gets obscured: Far more people kill themselves with a firearm each year than are murdered with one. In 2010 in the U.S., xix,392 people committed suicide with guns, compared with 11,078 who were killed by others. According to Matthew Miller, associate director of the Harvard Injury Control Inquiry Center (HICRC) at Harvard Schoolhouse of Public Health, "If every life is important, and if you're trying to save people from dying by gunfire, and so you can't ignore nigh two-thirds of the people who are dying." Suicide is the 10th-leading crusade of death in the U.Due south.; in 2010, 38,364 people killed themselves. In more than than half of these cases, they used firearms. Indeed, more than people in this country kill themselves with guns than with all other intentional means combined, including hanging, poisoning or overdose, jumping, or cutting. Though guns are not the almost common method by which people attempt suicide, they are the most lethal. Near 85 percent of suicide attempts with a firearm cease in expiry. (Drug overdose, the nearly widely used method in suicide attempts, is fatal in less than iii percent of cases.) Moreover, guns are an irreversible solution to what is often a passing crunch. Suicidal individuals who take pills or inhale car exhaust or employ razors accept time to reconsider their actions or summon assistance. With a firearm, once the trigger is pulled, there's no turning back.

Not "Why?" simply "How?"

When we call back of suicide, we unremarkably think of a desperate human activity capping years of torment. According to the National Constitute of Mental Wellness, complex and deep-rooted problems—such equally depression and other mental disorders, drug and alcohol corruption, family violence, and a family history of suicide—often shadow victims. Suicide amidst males is four times college than amid females. In adults, separation or divorce raises the risk of suicide attempts. In young people, physical or sexual abuse and disruptive beliefs increase vulnerability.

The harrowing fact of suicide demands a story: "Why?" But from a public health perspective, an equally illuminating question is "How?" Intent matters, only then does method, because the method by which one attempts suicide has a great deal to do with whether one lives or dies. What makes guns the near common way of suicide in this state? The answer: They are both lethal and accessible. Most one in iii American households contains a gun. The toll of this like shooting fish in a barrel admission is high. Gun owners and their families are much more likely to kill themselves than are non-gun-owners. A 2008 written report by Miller and David Hemenway, HICRC director and writer of the book Private Guns, Public Wellness, constitute that rates of firearm suicides in states with the highest rates of gun ownership are 3.7 times higher for men and 7.9 times higher for women, compared with states with the lowest gun ownership—though the rates of non-firearm suicides are virtually the same. A gun in the domicile raises the suicide risk for everyone: gun owner, spouse and children alike.

This stark connection holds true even when other factors are taken into account. "It was a reasonable hypothesis to think that the type of person who chooses to ain a gun is different from the blazon of person who chooses not to. Maybe at that place'southward a 'become-it-lone' attitude that leads to less help seeking. Or maybe gun owners are more likely to live in rural areas, and rural locales are associated with greater suicidality," explains Catherine Barber, manager of HICRC'southward Means Thing campaign, a suicide prevention effort that focuses on the ways people endeavor to take their own lives. "Only when we compared people in gun-owning households to people not in gun-owning households, in that location was no divergence in terms of rates of mental affliction or in terms of the proportion saying that they had seriously considered suicide," Hairdresser says. "Really, amongst gun owners, a smaller proportion say that they had attempted suicide. Then it'south not that gun owners are more suicidal. It's that they're more than likely to die in the event that they become suicidal, considering they are using a gun."

While gun-suicide rates are higher in rural states, which accept proportionally more than gun owners, the gun-suicide link plays out in urban areas, besides. "In the early on 1990s, the dramatic rising in young black male suicides was in lock step with the homicide epidemic of those years," says HSPH's Deborah Azrael, acquaintance director of the Harvard Youth Violence Prevention Center. "Young black male suicide rates approached those of young white males—though blackness suicide rates had ever been much lower than white suicide rates. It was entirely attributable to an increase in suicide by firearms." Put simply, the fatal link applies across the board. "It's true of men, information technology'due south true of women, it'southward true of kids. It's true of blacks, it'due south true of whites," says Azrael. "Cut information technology however you want: In places where exposure to guns is higher, more than people dice of suicide."

Impulsive Acts

The scientific study of suicide has partly been an endeavor to erase myths. Perhaps the biggest fallacy is that suicides are typically long-planned deeds. While this can be true—people who attempt suicide often face up a cascade of bug—empirical evidence suggests that they act in a moment of brief but heightened vulnerability.

"One of the things that got me interested in launching the Means Affair campaign was that I had been reading through thousands of thumbnail sketches of suicide deaths, to meet if a reporting system we were testing was catching the feel for the case," says Hairdresser. "I started noticing that, jeez, this death happened the same twenty-four hours that the child was arguing with his parents, or that the immature human being had just broken upward with his girlfriend, or that the middle-aged guy had gotten word that the divorce papers had come through. That reactivity surprised me, because I'd always pictured suicide as existence a painful, deliberative process, something that was getting worse and worse, escalating until finally you've got it all planned out and you practise information technology. Information technology hadn't occurred to me that it could be a cop arguing with his wife, and in the midst of the argument, pulling out his gun and killing himself." This impulsivity was underscored in a 2001 study in Houston of people ages 13 to 34 who had survived a near-lethal suicide attempt. Asked how much fourth dimension had passed between when they decided to have their lives and when they really made the effort, a startling 24 percent said less than 5 minutes; 48 percent said less than twenty minutes; 70 percent said less than one 60 minutes; and 86 percent said less than eight hours. The episodic nature of suicidal feelings is also borne out in the aftermath: ix out of 10 people who try suicide and survive do non go on to die by suicide later. As Miller puts it, "If yous relieve a life in the short run, you likely save a life in the long run."

Lethal Environments

A central tenet of public health is that environment shapes individual behavior. In the realm of suicide, this truth has played out dramatically in contempo history. When widely used lethal means are made less available or less deadly, suicide rates by that method decline, as do suicide rates overall. In Sri Lanka, for example, where pesticides are the leading suicide method, the suicide rate barbarous by half between 1995 and 2005, afterwards the almost highly human-toxic pesticides were restricted. Similarly, in the United kingdom before the 1950s, domestic gas derived from coal independent 10 to xx percent carbon monoxide, and poisoning by gas inhalation was the leading means of suicide. A source of natural gas virtually free of carbon monoxide was introduced in 1958; over fourth dimension, every bit carbon monoxide in gas decreased, then did the number of suicides overall—driven by a drib in carbon monoxide suicides, fifty-fifty as other methods increased somewhat. Changing the means by which people try to impale themselves doesn't necessarily ease the suicidal impulse or even the charge per unit of attempts. Just it does relieve lives by reducing the deadliness of those attempts.

Dearth of Information

Though these basic facts are known, there is a striking dearth of research on guns and suicide. In the U.S., government officials don't even have current data on where household gun ownership rates are college or lower. The just survey large plenty to produce state-level estimates of gun buying was conducted past the federal Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Arrangement, the world's largest ongoing telephone wellness survey. The survey asked questions about gun ownership in 2001, 2002 and, for the terminal fourth dimension, in 2004. It was HICRC investigators who analyzed this state-level data to show that suicide rates run in tandem with gun buying rates.

Today, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Tearing Death Reporting Arrangement, which collects data from constabulary and coroners' reports and expiry certificates on every suicide and homicide, covers only 18 states. Compare this with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration'south Fatality Analysis Reporting System, which amasses extensive details within 30 days of every fatal auto crash on public roads, from the fourth dimension and location of the accident to weather conditions to the role of alcohol and drugs. Partly as a consequence of this bureaucratic diligence, the fatality charge per unit from motorcar crashes has dropped past virtually a tertiary over the last two decades. Could the same dedication bring downwards suicides? Matthew Miller thinks it tin can. "Better information is a good place to start. That way, discussions are grounded in facts rather than distorted by ideology. It tin but help foster social-norm-shifting conversations similar to those that took place around cigarette smoking, safety belt apply and driving drunk," he says. "I'd like physicians to feel it's their responsibility to tell people about the risks. At that place's no reason that you should have a conversation about a bike helmet or a seat belt, but non firearms." But change also takes fourth dimension. "With public health, when you don't take the one-size-fits-all solution, you chip abroad at the problem," says Hairdresser. Preventing suicides will likely require many approaches, from educational activity and media campaigns to skilled treatment and community support. Ultimately, the goal is to transcend politics—which is why those who accept lost loved ones to gun suicide should take the final word:

Ryan is my baby. I remember in one case telling him, "If anything happens to you, I would cease to exist." And that's what information technology feels like. It'southward a hurting similar no other. I would encourage open up chat—really talking almost information technology. Preventing simply one person from going through what I went through and volition go through for the rest of my life—that would be enough for me.

Wendy Tapp, mother of nineteen-twelvemonth-erstwhile Ryan Tapp, who shot himself with a handgun in 2011

Politics
& Beyond

Gun violence is ane of the most politically divisive issues in the United States–and this contentiousness has played out in regime funding of enquiry. In 1993, a study supported past the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) plant that, rather than conferring protection, keeping a gun in the house raises the chance almost threefold of beingness shot by a family unit member or intimate acquaintance. Enraged by what it has called an "almost cruel sentiment against personal firearms ownership," the National Rifle Association in 1996 successfully lobbied Congress to insert this restriction into the CDC budget: "None of the funds made available … may be used to advocate or promote gun control." It was a pointed prohibition that went far across the rule that federal enquiry money cannot be used for lobbying on any issue. The restriction, which was interpreted broadly by CDC, served as a virtual ban on firearms research. Since the mid-1990s, the agency's gun prophylactic inquiry upkeep has dropped by 96 percent. In 2011, the NRA'south official website offered a rationale for its efforts to stifle research: "These junk science studies … are designed to provide ammunition for the gun control lobby by advancing the false notion that legal gun ownership is a danger to the public health instead of an inalienable right."

Trusting the messenger

Merely according to Matthew Miller, associate director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Centre (HICRC), "The public health message is neither anti-gun nor pro-gun. It'due south pro-data. A public wellness arroyo doesn't look so much to arraign equally to empathise and prevent."

"Similar older white men, people with mental health problems, people with family histories of suicide, etc., gun owners are 'our' people," adds the HICRC's Catherine Barber, referring to groups with increased suicide gamble. "Nosotros can't reach them with an anti-gun agenda. That'due south similar sending an anti-gay group to do a suicide prevention campaign in the gay and lesbian customs. If you don't trust the messenger, you don't trust the message." The Newtown, Connecticut, massacre, in which the immature gunman, Adam Lanza, ended his own life later the elementary school rampage, opened another public health line of argument: that preventing suicides may also forbid homicides, including the relatively tiny number of mass murders. "Mass homicide is an outrageously hostile acting out," says Miller, "and ane can only imagine that information technology is deeply connected with a hostility directed at oneself likewise." Yet for Barber, the public health conversation around guns is actually trickier since Newtown, because political positions have grown more entrenched. Toiling for years on the knotty problem of gun suicide has changed her perspective on gun control. "I'm more enlightened of the cultural divide betwixt gun owners and not-gun-owners, specially when they become politicized and recollect ill of one another," she says. "Some gun owners recollect guns brand their family safer. A lot of the guys, they honey the mechanism in guns–it's the aforementioned as the love for fine woodworking tools. In that location can also be cultural connections, where they learned to shoot from their dad or their uncle. Gun owners and not-gun-owners are both caring, but they view the world differently."

Could new laws prevent gun suicide?

The current political fence swirls around universal background checks and assault weapons bans and magazine limits–policies unlikely to have a measurable bear on on suicide. Deborah Azrael, associate director of the Harvard Youth Violence Prevention Middle, is heartened past a less-trumpeted 1999 Connecticut constabulary, which provides a mechanism for people to contact police when they fright a gun will be used for damage. Police force and prosecutors may obtain warrants to seize firearms from people who appear to exist an imminent danger to themselves or others. The private whose guns are taken has the correct to a hearing within two weeks. "There accept been hundreds and hundreds of people who have been motivated to call the constabulary since the police force was put into effect in the late 1990s," says Azrael. "And they're not saying, 'I recall my husband is going to kill me.' They're saying, 'I think my hubby is going to kill himself.'"

"The courage of our convictions"

Azrael worries that in the revived contend on gun violence, suicide will exist eclipsed. She also laments that public health researchers are ofttimes reluctant to spin out the implications of the scientific testify most firearms, for fear of beingness accused of an anti-gun bias. "It's a constraint that nearly researchers don't operate under. People who do inquiry on lung cancer are allowed to draw conclusions about smoking. The same with people who practise research on environmental exposure to PCBs, or on motor vehicle blueprint problems, or on drug overdoses. In that location's no national arrangement pillorying them or actively seeking to defund them." In other words, the frank and open conversation about guns that Americans demand to accept among themselves also applies to researchers who desire to share their findings with the public. Every bit Azrael sees information technology, "We need to take the courage of our convictions."

Madeline Drexler is the editor of Harvard Public Health Banner photo: Jan Stromme / gettyimages.com

View a map that shows every school shooting since Sandy Hook